SPY vs. RSP – Is It Time to Switch?

🌟 What does the SPY vs. RSP comparison reveal? 🌟

There's been a lot of market buzz lately about concentration risk in the US equity market. 🏛️ Conversations revolve around the “Magnificent 7,” AI hype 🤖, and the potential bursting of an AI bubble.

This raises a key question: Is it time to consider alternatives to the well-known SPY ETF and other market cap-weighted options? 💡

Let’s explore the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) as a potential alternative.

Analyzing the Pros and Cons of SPY vs. RSP

SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) Pros:

📈 Market Cap-Weighted: SPY tracks the S&P 500 index, which assigns greater influence to larger companies. This weighting strategy enables investors to benefit more from high-growth companies.
💧 Liquidity and Volume: SPY is one of the most traded ETFs globally, offering high liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads, thus reducing transaction costs.
💰 Cost-Effectiveness: With a relatively low expense ratio of 0.09%, SPY provides a cost-efficient way to gain exposure to the entire S&P 500 index.
📜 Historical Performance: As a widely recognized benchmark, SPY has a proven track record of long-term returns.
‍

Cons:

‍⚠️ Concentration Risk: Due to its market cap weighting, SPY is heavily concentrated in mega-cap stocks, especially in sectors like technology. This can expose investors to sector-specific risks.
⚖️ Less Equal Exposure: Smaller companies have a significantly lower impact on SPY’s overall performance, reducing diversification across different company sizes.

‍

RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) Pros:

🟰 Equal Weighting: RSP gives all S&P 500 constituents equal exposure, avoiding over-concentration in large-cap stocks. This balanced approach allows smaller companies to contribute equally to the overall performance.
🌐 Diversification: The equal-weighted strategy results in broader diversification across all sectors and companies, reducing idiosyncratic risks tied to specific large-cap stocks.
📊 Performance Potential: Under certain market conditions, RSP can outperform the cap-weighted S&P 500. Historically, RSP has outperformed during periods such as 2003-2007, 2008-2011, and 2020-2023.
‍

Cons:

📉 Higher Volatility: Equal weighting increases exposure to smaller and mid-sized companies, leading to higher volatility compared to SPY. Since 2003, RSP’s six-month historical volatility has been higher than SPY about 85% of the time, averaging 1.6% above SPY’s volatility.
💵 Higher Expense Ratio: With an expense ratio of 0.20%, RSP incurs slightly higher costs for investors.
🔄 Rebalancing Costs: RSP’s equal-weight methodology requires regular rebalancing, leading to higher turnover and transaction costs within the fund.

Summary

SPY offers broad market exposure with a focus on large-cap stocks, providing lower costs and high liquidity, though it comes with concentration risks. In contrast, RSP offers more balanced exposure to all S&P 500 constituents, reducing the impact of large-cap stocks but with slightly higher costs and potentially increased volatility.

Currently, the SPY vs. RSP ratio is trading near historical highs. 📈 Although their correlation remains positive, it has declined to around 0.8 from a more typical range of 0.96 to 0.98. Since RSP’s launch in 2003, returns between the two ETFs have been comparable, though each ETF has had periods of outperformance and underperformance.

If you aim to mitigate concentration risk, exploring alternatives like RSP could be worth considering. 🌟

Happy Long-Term Investing from the Quantlake Team!

‍

‍

‍